Political and legal norms & factors of return of forced migrants to their homeland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32752/2786-5185-2024-4-2-5-29Keywords:
Refugees, Forced migrants, Voluntary, safe and sustainable return, Factors of return, Migration law, Migration policyAbstract
The article is devoted to the review of political and legal norms and principles developed by the international community and aimed at ensuring the most desirable of possible long-term solutions to the refugees, namely, voluntary, safe and sustainable return to the homeland. In it are considered factors of the return of forced migrants, including their individual characteristics (age, gender, family composition, education, individual experience), structural factors, that is, the security and socio-economic situation in the country of origin and the situation in which refugees are in the country of refuge, as well as political factors, that is, the politics of host and origin countries, international humanitarian organizations. An analysis of repatriation flows, the policies of individual countries and international organizations that had to solve the problems of returning refugees was carried out. A conclusion was made about the expediency of using this experience in the formation of the forecast of the return of Ukrainian war refugees to the Motherland and the development of political decisions that will contribute to this, which is of not only scientific, but also practical interest. This experience shows, in particular, that return programs should be integrated into the general strategy of reconstruction and development of the country after the end of the conflict, providing not only assistance in moving, but also substantial support for the reintegration of returnees in their homeland. It also follows that effective solutions to facilitate repatriation can be found only under the condition of close cooperation between the countries of origin and residence of refugees and with the assistance of international humanitarian organizations. Such programs must be institutionally and resource-secured, developed on the basis of verified statistical and scientific data, be regionally oriented, take into account the interests of both returnees and the local population that did not leave anywhere. It is important to realize that return is not a one-time act, but a long-term process. Migrants’ strategies may involve not only returning home or staying abroad, but also a combination of these options, characterized by concepts such as temporary, cyclical, delayed, incomplete return. In this regard, measures to encourage return should be addressed not only to returnees themselves, but also to refugees who are currently still abroad, provide the protection of their rights and interests, development of relations with them in the interest of their possible return home.
References
Андел І. В. (2013). Екологічна міграція населення у регіонах України. Соціально-економічні проблеми сучасного періоду України. Вип. 3. С. 451–457 URL: http://ird.gov.ua/sep/sep20133(101)/sep20133(101)_451_AndelIV.pdf
Конвенція про статус біженців. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_011#Text
УВКБ ООН (1984). Картахенская декларация о беженцах, принятая на коллоквиуме по теме «Международная защита беженцев в Центральной Америке, Мексике и Панаме: юридические и гуманитарные проблемы». URL: https://www.unhcr.org/ru/wp-content/uploads/sites/73/2019/12...8C_1984.pdf
Black R., Koser K., Munk K. et al. (2004). Understanding voluntary return. University of Sussex. Report. URL: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/11041/
Chimni B. (2003). Post-conflict peace-building and the return of refugees: Concepts, practices, and institutions. Refugees and forced displacement: International security, human vulnerability, and the state. URL: https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:2434/nLib9280810863.pdf
Constant L., Shelly C., Blake J. S. et al. (2021). In Search of a Durable Solution. Examining the Factors Influencing Postconflict Refugee Returns. URL: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RRA1300/RRA1327-1/RAND_RRA1327-1.pdf
Crisp J. (2019). Repatriation principles under pressure. Forced Migration Review. Vol. 62. рр. 19–23. URL: https://www.fmreview.org/sites/default/files/FMRdownloads/en/return/crisp.pdf
Federal Ministry of Interior and Community (2023). General overview of return policy. URL: https://www.bmi.bund.de/EN/topics/migration/law-on-foreigners/return-policy/general-overview-of-return/general-overview-of-return-policy-node.html;jsessionid=DC17B6FD4C60B4F3061CD9CEDB0BC244.live862
Global Compact on Refugees. URL: https://www.unhcr.org/media/global-compact-refugees-booklet
Harild N., Christensen A., Zetter R. (2015). Sustainable refugee return: Triggers, constraints, and lessons on addressing the development challenges of forced displacement. Washington D.C.: World Bank Group. URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/ec025dca-77c1-5495-bdd4-00032a607b1e/content
IOM (2023a). Assisted Voluntary Return and Reintegration. URL: https://www.retornovoluntario.pt/uploads/a58c605e7e2f2caf23efe739eb4a3ad7.pdf
IOM (2023b). Ukraine Returns Report. General Population Survey. Round 14, October 2023. URL: https://dtm.iom.int/reports/ukraine-returns-report-general-population-survey-round-14-september-october-2023
Onder H., Haneen S. (2019). The Mobility of Displaced Syrians: An Economic and Social Analysis. Washington D.C.: World Bank Group. URL: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1401-3
Organization of African Unity (OAU). Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (September 10, 1969). URL: http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b36018.htm
Stefanovic D., & Loizides N. (2017). Peaceful Returns: Reversing Ethnic Cleansing after the Bosnian War. International Migration. Vol. 55(5). pp. 217–234. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12382
Valenta M., Strabac Z. (2013). The Dynamics of Bosnian Refugee Migrations in the 1990s, Current Migration Trends and Future Prospects. Refugee Survey Quarterly. Vol. 32(3). pp. 1–22. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdt013
UNHCR (1996). Handbook – Voluntary Repatriation: International Protection. URL: https://www.unhcr.org/uk/media/handbook-voluntary-repatriation-international-protection
UNHCR (2003). Framework for Durable Solutions for Refugees and Persons of Concern. URL: https://www.unhcr.org/media/framework-durable-solutions-refugees-and-persons-concern-0
UNHCR (2022). Global Trends Report. URL: https://www.unhcr.org/global-trends-report-2022
UNHCR (2023a). Lives on Hold #4 – Intentions and perspectives of refugees from Ukraine: Regional Intentions Report. URL: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/lives-hold-4-intentions-and-perspectives-refugees-ukraine-regional-intentions-report-july-2023
UNHCR (2023b). Position on voluntary return to Ukraine. URL: https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/649a7c744.pdf
UNHCR (2023c). Refugee Data Finder. https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics/download/?url=sH5pnE
Žíla O. (2019). After Coming Home: Forms and Meanings of Return in Dayton’s Bosnia and Herzegovina. Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU. Vol. 67(3). pp. 523–543. URL: https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1903523Z
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Olena Malynovska

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
