Political and legal norms & factors of return of forced migrants to their homeland

Authors

  • Malynovska Olena The National Institute for Strategic Studies image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32752/2786-5185-2024-4-2-5-29

Keywords:

Refugees, Forced migrants, Voluntary, safe and sustainable return, Factors of return, Migration law, Migration policy

Abstract

The article is devoted to the review of political and legal norms and principles developed by the international community and aimed at ensuring the most desirable of possible long-term solutions to the refugees, namely, voluntary, safe and sustainable return to the homeland. In it are considered factors of the return of forced migrants, including their individual characteristics (age, gender, family composition, education, individual experience), structural factors, that is, the security and socio-economic situation in the country of origin and the situation in which refugees are in the country of refuge, as well as political factors, that is, the politics of host and origin countries, international humanitarian organizations. An analysis of repatriation flows, the policies of individual countries and international organizations that had to solve the problems of returning refugees was carried out. A conclusion was made about the expediency of using this experience in the formation of the forecast of the return of Ukrainian war refugees to the Motherland and the development of political decisions that will contribute to this, which is of not only scientific, but also practical interest. This experience shows, in particular, that return programs should be integrated into the general strategy of reconstruction and development of the country after the end of the conflict, providing not only assistance in moving, but also substantial support for the reintegration of returnees in their homeland. It also follows that effective solutions to facilitate repatriation can be found only under the condition of close cooperation between the countries of origin and residence of refugees and with the assistance of international humanitarian organizations. Such programs must be institutionally and resource-secured, developed on the basis of verified statistical and scientific data, be regionally oriented, take into account the interests of both returnees and the local population that did not leave anywhere. It is important to realize that return is not a one-time act, but a long-term process. Migrants’ strategies may involve not only returning home or staying abroad, but also a combination of these options, characterized by concepts such as temporary, cyclical, delayed, incomplete return. In this regard, measures to encourage return should be addressed not only to returnees themselves, but also to refugees who are currently still abroad, provide the protection of their rights and interests, development of relations with them in the interest of their possible return home.

Author Biography

  • Malynovska Olena, The National Institute for Strategic Studies

    She is a member of the editorial board of this journal, but was not involved in the review process or the decision to publish this article.

References

Андел І. В. (2013). Екологічна міграція населення у регіонах України. Соціально-економічні проблеми сучасного періоду України. Вип. 3. С. 451–457 URL: http://ird.gov.ua/sep/sep20133(101)/sep20133(101)_451_AndelIV.pdf

Конвенція про статус біженців. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_011#Text

УВКБ ООН (1984). Картахенская декларация о беженцах, принятая на коллоквиуме по теме «Международная защита беженцев в Центральной Америке, Мексике и Панаме: юридические и гуманитарные проблемы». URL: https://www.unhcr.org/ru/wp-content/uploads/sites/73/2019/12...8C_1984.pdf

Black R., Koser K., Munk K. et al. (2004). Understanding voluntary return. University of Sussex. Report. URL: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/11041/

Chimni B. (2003). Post-conflict peace-building and the return of refugees: Concepts, practices, and institutions. Refugees and forced displacement: International security, human vulnerability, and the state. URL: https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:2434/nLib9280810863.pdf

Constant L., Shelly C., Blake J. S. et al. (2021). In Search of a Durable Solution. Examining the Factors Influencing Postconflict Refugee Returns. URL: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RRA1300/RRA1327-1/RAND_RRA1327-1.pdf

Crisp J. (2019). Repatriation principles under pressure. Forced Migration Review. Vol. 62. рр. 19–23. URL: https://www.fmreview.org/sites/default/files/FMRdownloads/en/return/crisp.pdf

Federal Ministry of Interior and Community (2023). General overview of return policy. URL: https://www.bmi.bund.de/EN/topics/migration/law-on-foreigners/return-policy/general-overview-of-return/general-overview-of-return-policy-node.html;jsessionid=DC17B6FD4C60B4F3061CD9CEDB0BC244.live862

Global Compact on Refugees. URL: https://www.unhcr.org/media/global-compact-refugees-booklet

Harild N., Christensen A., Zetter R. (2015). Sustainable refugee return: Triggers, constraints, and lessons on addressing the development challenges of forced displacement. Washington D.C.: World Bank Group. URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/ec025dca-77c1-5495-bdd4-00032a607b1e/content

IOM (2023a). Assisted Voluntary Return and Reintegration. URL: https://www.retornovoluntario.pt/uploads/a58c605e7e2f2caf23efe739eb4a3ad7.pdf

IOM (2023b). Ukraine Returns Report. General Population Survey. Round 14, October 2023. URL: https://dtm.iom.int/reports/ukraine-returns-report-general-population-survey-round-14-september-october-2023

Onder H., Haneen S. (2019). The Mobility of Displaced Syrians: An Economic and Social Analysis. Washington D.C.: World Bank Group. URL: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1401-3

Organization of African Unity (OAU). Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (September 10, 1969). URL: http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b36018.htm

Stefanovic D., & Loizides N. (2017). Peaceful Returns: Reversing Ethnic Cleansing after the Bosnian War. International Migration. Vol. 55(5). pp. 217–234. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12382

Valenta M., Strabac Z. (2013). The Dynamics of Bosnian Refugee Migrations in the 1990s, Current Migration Trends and Future Prospects. Refugee Survey Quarterly. Vol. 32(3). pp. 1–22. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdt013

UNHCR (1996). Handbook – Voluntary Repatriation: International Protection. URL: https://www.unhcr.org/uk/media/handbook-voluntary-repatriation-international-protection

UNHCR (2003). Framework for Durable Solutions for Refugees and Persons of Concern. URL: https://www.unhcr.org/media/framework-durable-solutions-refugees-and-persons-concern-0

UNHCR (2022). Global Trends Report. URL: https://www.unhcr.org/global-trends-report-2022

UNHCR (2023a). Lives on Hold #4 – Intentions and perspectives of refugees from Ukraine: Regional Intentions Report. URL: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/lives-hold-4-intentions-and-perspectives-refugees-ukraine-regional-intentions-report-july-2023

UNHCR (2023b). Position on voluntary return to Ukraine. URL: https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/649a7c744.pdf

UNHCR (2023c). Refugee Data Finder. https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics/download/?url=sH5pnE

Žíla O. (2019). After Coming Home: Forms and Meanings of Return in Dayton’s Bosnia and Herzegovina. Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU. Vol. 67(3). pp. 523–543. URL: https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1903523Z

Published

2024-04-29

How to Cite

Malynovska, O. (2024). Political and legal norms & factors of return of forced migrants to their homeland. Migration & Law, 4(2), 5-29. https://doi.org/10.32752/2786-5185-2024-4-2-5-29